← All templates · Template 7
District Consumer Commission Complaint Outline
Tap any highlighted blank and type your details. Words inswitch when you tap them. When you are done, print the letter or save it as a PDF — blanks you leave empty print as ruled lines you can fill in by hand.
Answer a few simple questions. We will prepare the letter for you to read, save as a PDF, and share on WhatsApp or email.
0 of 0 details filled
You can now tap anywhere in the letter to change, remove, or add text. Tap “Done editing” when finished.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019
Complainant:
, ,
Residing at
Mobile: , Email:
Opposite Party:
, through its
1. JURISDICTION
The Opposite Party carries on business within this district / the cause of action arose within this district. The value of the goods or services paid as consideration is Rs. , which is within the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Commission.
2. FACTS OF THE CASE (in chronological order)
2.1 On , was admitted to the Opposite Party hospital for , under Patient ID .
2.2 The patient was discharged on . The Opposite Party raised Bill No. for Rs. , which the Complainant paid in full (, receipts annexed).
2.3 On examining the itemised bill, the Complainant found irregularities totalling Rs. across line items, detailed in the annexed statement (Annexure A3). These include medicines or devices charged above their printed MRP or the ceiling prices notified under the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 2013. These include procedure charges far in excess of the CGHS 2025 benchmark rates published by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. These include items billed more than once. These include items billed although never administered or provided. These include doctor visits billed in excess of those recorded in the case sheet. These include separate charges for consumables already included in the room or procedure charges. These include charges levied over and above an agreed all-inclusive package rate. These include lump-sum entries with no item-wise break-up. These further include the discrepancies detailed in the annexed statement.
2.4 On , the Complainant wrote to the Opposite Party's billing department disputing the specific items and seeking a refund within 7 days, delivered by (Annexure A4). No response was received within the 7-day period.
2.5 On , the Complainant escalated the matter to the Opposite Party's Grievance Redressal Officer under right (xix) of the Charter of Patients' Rights, delivered by (Annexure A5). No resolution was provided within the 15-day period.
3. DEFICIENCY IN SERVICE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICE
3.1 Raising charges of the kind described in paragraph 2.3 amounts to deficiency in service under Section 2(11) and unfair trade practice under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Charging above notified ceiling prices additionally violates the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 2013, which is legally binding on the Opposite Party. Billing for items charged twice or never provided amounts to an unfair trade practice on its face.
3.2 The Opposite Party failed to display its rates, provide a detailed itemised bill on request, and operate an effective grievance redressal mechanism, contrary to the Charter of Patients' Rights under the Clinical Establishments Act, 2010 (rights ii, iii, and xix).
4. RELIEF SOUGHT
The Complainant prays that this Hon'ble Commission direct the Opposite Party to:
a) Refund Rs. , the amount charged in excess of reasonable and lawful rates, with interest at 12% per annum from the date of payment;
b) Pay Rs. as compensation for mental agony and harassment;
c) Pay Rs. towards the costs of this litigation;
d) Pass any other order deemed fit in the interests of justice.
5. LIMITATION
This complaint is filed within two years of the cause of action, as required under Section 69 of the Act.
6. DECLARATION
The Complainant declares that the subject matter of this complaint is not pending before any other court or forum.
VERIFICATION
I, , verify that the contents of this complaint are true to my knowledge and belief.
Place:
Date:
[Signature of Complainant]
LIST OF ANNEXURES
A1. Itemised hospital bill and payment receipts
A2. Discharge summary
A3. Benchmark comparison table (bill vs CGHS / NPPA rates) with source printouts
A4. Dispute letter dated with proof of delivery
A5. Grievance escalation letter dated with proof of delivery
A6. Hospital's replies, if any
A7. Affidavit verifying the complaint
Everything you type stays in your browser on this device — nothing is sent to BillOkay or anyone else. Saved details are reused if you come back to this page on the same device. Use “Reset letter” above to remove them.
How to use this letter
What this document is
This is an outline for a District Consumer Commission complaint that you complete and file yourself — it is not a letter that BillOkay sends. A sworn affidavit verifying the facts must go with it before filing, and a lawyer or a friend with legal training should read the finished draft. This is not legal advice.
What to do with it
- Complete every blank. If a section does not apply, tap “Edit letter wording” above to remove or reword it.
- If an insurer is involved, add a section 2.6 about your insurer grievance and Ombudsman complaint using “Edit letter wording” — the outline is hospital-only by default.
- Print the final draft, sign it, and get the accompanying affidavit sworn and notarised (or attested by an Oath Commissioner) — it verifies the facts of the complaint.
- File it online at e-jagriti.gov.in — upload the complaint, annexures, and affidavit; there is no fee below Rs. 5 lakh — or physically at the District Consumer Commission's filing counter.
- Before filing, also consider logging the grievance on the National Consumer Helpline (1915 or consumerhelpline.gov.in) — a helpline complaint sometimes triggers a settlement without a hearing.
Questions you may be asked
- “Where is your affidavit?”
- “Attached as Annexure A7 — sworn and notarised, verifying the contents of the complaint.”
- “Have you exhausted the internal grievance route?”
- “Yes. The dispute letter (Annexure A4) and the grievance escalation to the hospital's Grievance Redressal Officer (Annexure A5) are both on record, with proof of delivery.”
- “What is the pecuniary jurisdiction here?”
- “The value of the services paid is set out in section 1 of the complaint and is within the District Commission's limit of Rs. 50 lakh.”
- “Is this complaint pending anywhere else?”
- “No — the declaration in section 6 confirms it, and the affidavit re-verifies that.”
Keep calm, keep records
- The limitation period is two years from the cause of action — usually the discharge or the hospital's final refusal to refund.
- There is no court fee for claims up to Rs. 5 lakh at the District Commission, and no lawyer is required to file or appear.
- For large or contested claims, consider consulting an advocate before filing — self-filing on e-Jagriti remains valid either way.
Attach (as annexures): itemised bill and payment receipts; discharge summary; your benchmark comparison table with CGHS and NPPA source printouts; the Template 2 dispute letter and Template 3 grievance letter with proof of delivery; any hospital replies; and a sworn affidavit verifying the facts of the complaint.
How to file: file online at e-jagriti.gov.in — no court fee for claims up to Rs. 5 lakh, and you can upload the complaint, annexures, and affidavit yourself. You can also file physically at the District Consumer Commission's filing counter with two hard copies plus one copy for each opposite party. A sworn affidavit verifying the facts is required either way.